Your practice, explained in plain language
We write the feature around your work and manage the placement. You review and revise until it is right, and nothing publishes without your approval.
We develop your story, write the feature to editorial standard, and manage the placement. You approve every word before anything goes live.
Artist Weekly is a digital publication covering artists, creative practice and the people making work across visual art, music, design and performance.
It is not a critical arts publication and should never be presented as one. It is a permanent, searchable article that explains your work to galleries, venues and clients.
Best for: Visual artists, musicians, designers and creative studios.
An independent digital culture title rather than the established arts press, which makes it accessible and means a placement carries correspondingly less critical weight. Direct pitching works where the fit is right. Contributed and sponsored placement is accepted here far more readily than at established arts publications, and that is a paid route described as one. Most artists use the service route: we write the feature around the work, place it, and you revise until it is right before anything goes live. Nobody is assessing the work critically, so it should never be presented as a review, because curators, galleries and critics know the difference immediately and overstating it damages you with the people you most want to reach.
The work, not the career. What the materials are, the question the practice keeps returning to, what changed in the studio and why, what you tried that failed. Readers of arts coverage are used to statements that say nothing, so concrete description stands out at once. Context gives the piece somewhere to go: where the work sits, who it is for, where it has been shown, what you are making next. Strong images matter as much as the text, because weak photography of good work undersells you. It runs as a standalone profile written in plain language for a general reader rather than for critics or academics, and it should be something you can send a gallery, a venue or a commissioning client.
Creative work is hard to explain in a portfolio and easy to explain in an article, which is why a written feature is useful to artists.
Here is what Artist Weekly is, what it is not, and how people get featured.
Artist Weekly is a digital publication covering artists, creative practice and the people making work across visual art, music, design and performance. Online only, permanently live, and indexed by search engines.
It sits among the independent digital culture titles rather than the established arts press, which shapes both how accessible it is and what a placement means.
Its coverage is written for a general reader with an interest in creative work rather than for critics or academics, which sets the register of what appears there.
Worth being blunt about.
A feature here is not the same as a review in a major arts publication or a national culture desk. Curators, galleries and critics know the difference, and presenting a smaller digital feature as though it were a serious critical notice will damage you with exactly the people you want to impress.
What it does well is different and still real. It gives you a permanent, credible article that explains your practice in plain language, appears when someone searches your name, and can be sent to a gallery, a collector, a venue or a commissioning client who is deciding whether to take you seriously. For most working artists that is a genuine gap, and it is the gap this fills.
Treat it as the first entry on a public record rather than as the record itself.
A solo, dedicated article about you and your work, with a headline and angle built around your practice. Typically images of the work and links to your website and socials.
It publishes permanently and stays indexed, so it keeps working every time someone researches you.
It is a profile rather than a review. Nobody is assessing the work critically, and it should never be described as though they were.
Talk about the work, not the career.
The features that read well explain what you are actually doing: the materials, the question the work keeps returning to, what changed in your practice and why, what you were trying and failed at. Readers of arts coverage are used to statements that say nothing, so specificity stands out immediately.
Good images matter as much as the text. A piece with weak photography of strong work will undersell you.
Context helps as well. Where the work sits, who it is for, where it has been shown and what you are making next all give a reader somewhere to go once the article ends, which is the difference between being read and being remembered.
Share your work and your story, our team drafts the piece, you review with revisions until it is right, and nothing publishes until you approve it. Then it goes live and you get the link.
Digital Networking Agency works with Artist Weekly alongside a wide network of digital publications. Any provider who cannot show you the draft first is not one to use.
We will also say plainly when a specialist arts publication would serve your practice better.
Yes. It is a genuine article published on the outlet, written about you and your work — not an ad you design yourself.
Most placements take weeks rather than days. We give you a realistic timeline for Artist Weekly before we start, and never promise a date we cannot control.
You review and revise until it is right. Nothing publishes without your approval.
No, and it should never be presented as one. This is a smaller digital title. It is more accessible and carries less critical weight.
Visual artists, musicians, designers, performers and creative studios who need a clear, permanent article explaining their work.
Yes. You review and revise until it is right, and nothing publishes without your approval.